Lane v. United States of America
| Audry Lane |
| United States of America |
| 4:2018cv00975 |
| December 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Wed Jan 16 09:38:11 CST 2019 (crt) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: It is therefore ORDERED that defendant Lane must, by no later than January 30, 2019, either expressly inform the Court that he is withdrawing the 2255 motion, or complete and file a form motion under 2255, or show cause why the case should not be dismissed. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/15/2019) (skg)
|
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (skg) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER as to Audry Lane: For the foregoing reasons it is ORDERED that, by January 7, 2019, Audry Lane must either withdraw the document that the Court has recharacterized as Section 2255 motion #1 or he must file an amended motion on the Court's Section 2255 form that includes all grounds for relief he believes are available to him. The Clerk of Court is directed to open a new civil action (nature of suit code 510, motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence) and to follow standard case assignment and referral procedures for a Section 2255 motion. This order shall be docketed in the criminal case and in the civil case. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 12/7/2018) (skg)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 4:16-cr-245-O) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (skg) |
| New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: staff attorney DK. (skg) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2. and two Section 2255 forms have been mailed to Petitioner. Fri Dec 7 14:15:52 CST 2018 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Fri Dec 7 14:19:46 CST 2018 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lane v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Audry Lane | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
