Kemp v. USA
| Joey Kemp |
| USA |
| 4:2018cv00991 |
| December 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| John McBryde |
| Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: The court ORDERS that movant be, and is hereby, granted an extension of time until February 11, 2019, in which to file his reply. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 1/29/2019) (bdb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Tue Jan 29 12:12:46 CST 2019 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Tue Jan 29 12:13:46 CST 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 8 Reply in Opposition of United States' Failure to Respond to Court Mandate filed by Joey Kemp. (mpw) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE filed by USA re: #1 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255,, (wrb) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Substitution of Counsel by AUSA. Leigha A Simonton-DOJ for USA added, Wes Hendrix-DOJ terminated. (npk) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the motion and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. Wes Hendrix-DOJ for USA added. Response/Answer due by 1/14/2019. Replies due by 1/25/2019. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 12/14/2018) (bdb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Fri Dec 14 10:17:23 CST 2018 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3, 4. Fri Dec 14 08:32:12 CST 2018 (crt) |
|
Filing 4
Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 12/13/2018) (bdb)
|
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (bdb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION Requesting Briefing Schedule Order filed by Joey Kemp. (bdb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 4:17-cr-167-A(01)) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdb) |
| New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to Judge McBryde. (bdb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kemp v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Wes Hendrix-DOJ |
| Represented By: | Leigha A Simonton-DOJ |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Joey Kemp | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
