Franklin v. Wilson
Petitioner: Matthew Allen Franklin
Respondent: Eric D Wilson
Case Number: 4:2018cv01012
Filed: December 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: John McBryde
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2019 USCA Case Number 19-10195 in United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit for #10 Notice of Appeal, filed by Matthew Allen Franklin. (tle)
February 14, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #7 Judgment, #9 Order on Motion for Reconsideration, to the Fifth Circuit by Matthew Allen Franklin. T.O. form to appellant electronically at #Transcript Order Form or US Mail as appropriate. Copy of NOA to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. IMPORTANT ACTION REQUIRED: Provide an electronic copy of any exhibit you offered during a hearing or trial that was admitted into evidence to the clerk of the district court within 14 days of the date of this notice. Copies must be transmitted as PDF attachments through ECF by all ECF Users or delivered to the clerk on a CD by all non-ECF Users. See detailed instructions #here. (Exception: This requirement does not apply to a pro se prisoner litigant.) Please note that if original exhibits are in your possession, you must maintain them through final disposition of the case. (tle)
February 14, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. Thu Feb 14 15:16:07 CST 2019 (crt)
February 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Came on for consideration the #8 motion of applicant, Matthew Allen Franklin, for reconsideration. The court, having considered the motion, the record, and applicable authorities, finds that the motion should be denied. The court ORDERS that applicant's motion for reconsideration be, and is hereby, denied. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 2/5/2019) (tln)
February 5, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Tue Feb 5 11:55:40 CST 2019 (crt)
February 4, 2019 Filing 8 Request for Reconsideration re #7 Judgment, filed by Matthew Allen Franklin (wrb)
January 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FINAL JUDGMENT: Consistent with the order signed this date, the court ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES that the application of Matthew Allen Franklin for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 be, and is hereby, dismissed for want of exhaustion. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 1/25/2019) (tln)
January 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: The court ORDERS that the application in this action be, and is hereby, dismissed for want of exhaustion. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 1/25/2019) (tln)
January 25, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6,7. Fri Jan 25 11:42:24 CST 2019 (crt)
January 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order and Notice of Deficiency: Matthew Allen Franklin must address the following deficiency: $5 filing fee has not been paid nor has an application for IFP and CTA been submitted. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. Clerk to mail copy of this order to petitioner with IFP AND CTA form. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 1/2/2019) (wrb)
January 2, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. cy to Franklin with CTA and IFP forms Wed Jan 2 14:17:36 CST 2019 (crt)
December 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 12/27/2018) (wrb)
December 27, 2018 Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wrb)
December 27, 2018 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to staff attorney PW. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (wrb)
December 27, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2,3,4. cy to Franklin Thu Dec 27 10:06:07 CST 2018 (crt)
December 26, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 USC 2241 filed by Matthew Allen Franklin. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wrb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Franklin v. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric D Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Matthew Allen Franklin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?