Henriquez v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
| Martin Roberto Henriquez |
| Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID |
| 4:2019cv00047 |
| January 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Received letter from U.S. Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit re: No. 19-10076. The district court transferred your second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 motion to this court to determine whether to allow your successive action. I advise you of the following matters, see In re Tony Epps, 127 F.3d 364 (5th Cir. 1997). Under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(3) you must first receive this court's permission before you can file such an action in district court. You have 30 days from the date of this letter to file with this court a motion or authorization to proceed in the district court. [19-10076] (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (tle) |
Filing 4
ORDER OF TRANSFER: For the reasons discussed herein, Petitioner's 2254 petition should be TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further proceedings in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2244(b). (Fifth Circuit notified via copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing.) (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/16/2019) (skg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Wed Jan 16 11:44:37 CST 2019 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2,3. Tue Jan 15 13:47:16 CST 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wxc) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: If the last digit of this case is a 0 route file to staff attorney ARH. If the last digit is a 1-9, route file to staff attorney PW. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (wxc) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 filed by Martin Roberto Henriquez. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wxc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Henriquez v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Martin Roberto Henriquez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
