Kennedy v. United States et al
Edward Thomas Kennedy |
Federal Reserve System of the United States, Board of Governors, Blumber, Bagley, PLLC, United States, State Bar of Texas, Daniel E Blumberg, Peter F Bagley and United States Department of Treasury |
4:2019cv00144 |
February 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Jeffrey L Cureton |
Terry R Means |
Other Statutes: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Objection and Notice filed by Edward Thomas Kennedy re: #5 Findings and Recommendations filed by Edward Thomas Kennedy. (edm) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address for Pro Se litigant Edward Thomas Kennedy. New address: 800 Court Street #223, Reading, PA 19601. (edm) |
Filing 5 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND NOTICE AND ORDER: It is therefore RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs February 15, 2019 motion to proceed in forma pauperis [docket no. 2] be DENIED by the district judge. It is further RECOMMENDED that the district judge inform Plaintiff that the complaint will be subject to dismissal without further notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (b ), unless Plaintiff pays to the clerk of Court the filing and administrative fees of $400.00 within seven (7) days after the district judge's order. Under 28 U.S.C. 636, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted until March 5, 2019 to serve and file written objections to the United States Magistrate Judge's proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation. It is further ORDERED that the above-styled and numbered action, previously referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for findings, conclusions and recommendation, be and is hereby, RETURNED to the docket of the United States District Judge. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 2/19/2019) (edm) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue Feb 19 15:32:00 CST 2019 (crt) |
Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (edm) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: staff attorney DK. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (edm) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Edward Thomas Kennedy (edm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Peter F Bagley, Blumber, Bagley, PLLC, Daniel E Blumberg, Federal Reserve System of the United States, Board of Governors, State Bar of Texas, United States, United States Department of Treasury filed by Edward Thomas Kennedy. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (edm) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Fri Feb 15 14:25:16 CST 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.