v. ONE SIG SAUER, MODEL P226, 9MM CALIBER PISTOL, BEARING SERIAL NUMBER UU768145, AND FIFTEEN (15) ROUNDS OF 9MM CALIBER AMMUNITION
| ONE SIG SAUER, MODEL P226, 9MM CALIBER PISTOL, BEARING SERIAL NUMBER UU768145, AND FIFTEEN (15) ROUNDS OF 9MM CALIBER AMMUNITION |
| 4:2019xc00397 |
| May 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Forfeiture/Penalty: Drug Related Seizure of Property 21 USC 881 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Abandoned case - Case is not proceeding: Abandoned - response from attorney. (ldm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: v. ONE SIG SAUER, MODEL P226, 9MM CALIBER PISTOL, BEARING SERIAL NUMBER UU768145, AND FIFTEEN (15) ROUNDS OF 9MM CALIBER AMMUNITION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ONE SIG SAUER, MODEL P226, 9MM CALIBER PISTOL, BEARING SERIAL NUMBER UU768145, AND FIFTEEN (15) ROUNDS OF 9MM CALIBER AMMUNITION | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
