Trevino et al v. Sorenson et al
| Robert Trevino and Rosalinda Trevino |
| Donna Clark, Forshey Prostok LLP, Keegan Sorenson, Landrith & Kulesz LLP and Beth Giles |
| 4:2019cv00499 |
| June 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| John McBryde |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the order signed this date, the court ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES that the claims of plaintiffs, Robert Trevino and Rosalinda Trevino, against defendants, Keegan Sorenson, partner of Cantey Hanger LLP, Forshey Prostok, LLP, Donna Clark, Beth Giles, and Landrith & Kulesz, LLP, be, and are hereby, dismissed pursuant to the authority of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) (2). (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 6/27/2019) (tln)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: The court ORDERS that plaintiff's claims be, and are hereby, dismissed pursuant to the authority of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 6/27/2019) (tln)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10,11. Thu Jun 27 11:34:26 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 9 (Copy filed in state court) MOTION TO CHALLENGE JURISDICTION OF J-P COURT'S FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DETAINER EVICTION PROCESS BECAUSE IT IS INTERWINED WITH A TITLE DUSPUTE filed by Robert Trevino, Rosalinda Trevino. (tln) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER AUTHORIZING PARTIES TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 6/26/2019) (tln)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Wed Jun 26 11:19:41 CDT 2019 (crt) |
|
Filing 7
Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 6/25/2019) (tln)
|
| Filing 6 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (tln) |
| Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to staff attorney DK. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (tln) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Robert Trevino, Rosalinda Trevino. (tln) |
| Filing 3 Non-Judicial Temporary Restraining Order - Permanent Injunction & Demand for an Emergency Hearing Because of Pending Lawsuit filed by Robert Trevino, Rosalinda Trevino. (tln) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Remove a Civil Case to Federal Court Pursuant to 28 U.S. Code 1446 filed by Robert Trevino, Rosalinda Trevino. (tln) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from JP Court, case number JP02-19-e00121381 filed by Robert Trevino, Rosalinda Trevino. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (tln) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5,6,7. Tue Jun 25 14:33:57 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
