LeKashman v. BNSF Railway Company
Karen LeKashman |
BNSF Railway Company |
4:2019cv00516 |
June 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Terry R Means |
Civil Rights: Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by BNSF Railway Company identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Berkshire Hathaway Inc, Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC for BNSF Railway Company. (Harrison, Caroline) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,,, filed by BNSF Railway Company. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney Caroline C Harrison added to party BNSF Railway Company(pty:dft) (Harrison, Caroline) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to BNSF Railway Company ; served on 7/2/2019. (Taylor, Walter) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to BNSF Railway Company. (tln) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Means. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (tln) |
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS by Karen LeKashman. (see doc. #1 for image) (tln) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against BNSF Railway Company filed by Karen LeKashman. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10085542) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Additional Page(s)) (Taylor, Walter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: LeKashman v. BNSF Railway Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company | |
Represented By: | Caroline C Harrison |
Represented By: | Antonio U Allen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Karen LeKashman | |
Represented By: | Walter L Taylor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.