Hogan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
| Malcolm Hogan |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank NA |
| 4:2019cv00554 |
| July 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| John McBryde |
| Mark Pittman |
| Real Property: All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCEAND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER... The Joint Report, which shall be filed on or before September 19, 2019 (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 8/22/2019) (wxc)
|
| Clerk's notice to ECF Users in cases transferred under SO 3-329 from Judge John McBryde to Judge Mark Pittman: Judge Pittman permits electronic filing. His copy requirements for electronically filed documents are as follows: Sealed documents, dispositive motions, responses, replies, and appendices thereto and filings more than 25 pages in length, placed in a 3-ring binder, with exhibits or attachments tabbed, indexed, and bound. Delivery instructions are available in the link to the Judges' Copy Requirements found at the top of the notice of electronic filing sent to affected ECF users. (lrl) |
|
Filing 8
Special Order 3-329: On 8/8/19 the clerk is to reassign Fort Worth cases that are listed in the order and assigned to Senior District Judge McBryde and District Judge O'Connor to Judge Mark Pittman, and the cases will carry the suffix letter "P." (The clerk has mailed a copy to all non-ECF users.) (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 8/8/2019) (cea)
|
| Filing 7 Judge McBryde's paper original and copies pursuant to the standing order of document #1 filed by Wells Fargo Bank NA (edm) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wells Fargo Bank NA. (edm) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS by Wells Fargo Bank NA. (edm) |
| Filing 4 Judge McBryde's paper original and copies pursuant to the standing order of document #1 filed by Wells Fargo Bank NA (edm) |
|
Filing 3
Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 7/12/2019) (wxc)
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to Judge McBryde. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (wxc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 342nd Judicial District Court, Tarrant County, case number 342-308885-19 filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10112781) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Exhibit(s) F, #7 Exhibit(s) G, #8 Exhibit(s) H, #9 Exhibit(s) I) (McDougal, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
