Ali v. Nielsen et al
Murtaza Ali |
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kirstjen M. Nielsen and L. Francis Cissna |
4:2019cv00617 |
August 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
John McBryde |
Immigration: Naturalization Application |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Receipt of Certified Mail Return filed by Murtaza Ali (wxc) |
Filing 5 Summons issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (wxc) |
Filing 4 Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 8/7/2019) (wxc) |
Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wxc) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to Judge McBryde. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (wxc) |
Filing 1 Petition For Writ of Mandamus filed by Murtaza Ali. (Filing fee $400.00; receipt number FW033109) (wxc) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2,3,4,5. Wed Aug 7 14:36:06 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.