Cisneroz v. Saul
| Casey V. Cisneroz |
| Andrew Saul |
| Social Security Administration - Interested Party |
| 4:2019cv00620 |
| August 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey L Cureton |
| John McBryde |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
FINAL JUDGMENT: Consistent with the stipulation of voluntary dismissal filed August 12, 2019, the court ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES that the claims and causes of action of plaintiff, Casey V. Cisneroz, against defendant, Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, be, and are hereby, dismissed. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 8/15/2019) (tln)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RETURNING ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 8/14/2019) (bdb)
|
| Filing 8 Judge McBryde's paper original and copy of #1 Complaint, #2 Cert. Of Interested Persons/Disclosure Statement, #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Casey V. Cisneroz. (tln) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Casey V. Cisneroz. (tln) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER PERMITTING FILING IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND ORDER REGARDING COMPLETION OF SUMMONS AND ISSUANCE OF PROCESS: It is Ordered that the above named Plaintiff is authorized to proceed with the commencement of this civil suit without prepayment of fees or the necessity of giving security therefor, such that the motion/application to proceed in forma pauperis [docket no. #3 ] be, and is hereby, GRANTED. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 8/8/2019) (tln)
|
|
Filing 5
Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 8/7/2019) (tln)
|
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. File to staff attorney DK. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (tln) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Casey V. Cisneroz (Attachments: #1 Affidavit(s)) (Honig, Ronald) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Casey V. Cisneroz. (Honig, Ronald) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul filed by Casey V. Cisneroz. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Honig, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
