Elkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Edward Howard Elkins
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Case Number: 4:2019cv00708
Filed: September 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey L Cureton
Referring Judge: John McBryde
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 402
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 FINAL JUDGMENT... The court ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES that all claims and causes of action asserted by plaintiff against defendant, Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, be, and are hereby, dismissed without prejudice. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 9/10/2019) (wxc)
September 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ***See doc #11 for FINAL JUDGMENT *** FINAL JUDGMENT... In accordance with the stipulation of voluntary dismissal filed by plaintiff, Edward Howard Elkins, Jr., on September 9, 2019, The court ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES that all claims and causes of action asserted by plaintiff against defendant, Andrew Saul, dismissed. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 9/10/2019) (wxc) Modified on 9/10/2019 (wxc).
September 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RETURNING ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE... it is ORDERED that the above-styled and numbered action, previously referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for findings, conclusions and recommendation, be and hereby is returned to the docket of the United States District Judge for further action as deemed appropriate. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 9/10/2019) (wxc)
September 9, 2019 Filing 8 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal by Edward Howard Elkins. (wxc)
September 9, 2019 Filing 7 Judge McBryde's paper original and copies pursuant to the standing order of documents #1 , #2 , #3 received. (wxc)
September 6, 2019 Filing 6 ***PLEASE DISREGARD - SUMMONS ISSUED IN ERROR*** PDF DELETED BY DEPUTY CLERK Summons issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (wxc) Modified to remove PDF on 9/6/2019 (bdb).
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 9/6/2019) (wxc)
September 6, 2019 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. File to staff attorney DK. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (wxc)
September 6, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Edward Howard Elkins (Attachments: #1 Affidavit(s)) (Honig, Ronald)
September 6, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Edward Howard Elkins. (Honig, Ronald)
September 6, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Edward Howard Elkins. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Honig, Ronald)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward Howard Elkins
Represented By: Ronald D Honig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?