Santis Produce, LLC v. Mibo Fresh Foods, LLC et al
Santis Produce, LLC |
Mibo Fresh Foods, LLC, Sabas Montalvo and Uzor U. Nwoko |
4:2019cv00775 |
September 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Other Statutes: Agricultural Acts |
07 U.S.C. § 499 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Civil Case Terminated per #14 Stipulation of Dismissal. (edm) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Dismissal Voluntary, without Prejudice, as to Defendant Sabas Montalvo filed by Santis Produce, LLC (Stokes, Craig) |
Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL without Prejudice by Santis Produce, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stokes, Craig) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Sabas Montalvo ; served on 9/30/2019. (Stokes, Craig) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Uzor U. Nwoko ; served on 9/30/2019. (Stokes, Craig) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Mibo Fresh Foods, LLC ; served on 9/30/2019. (Stokes, Craig) |
|
Filing 9 MOTION Leave to Proceed Without Local Attorney filed by Santis Produce, LLC with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stokes, Craig) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing Attorney Certification Why Notice Should Not Be Required Pursuant to Rule 65(b) filed by Santis Produce, LLC (Stokes, Craig) |
Filing 7 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Santis Produce, LLC re #6 MOTION for Injunction Preliminary Injunction, #5 MOTION for Order to Show Cause MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (Stokes, Craig) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Injunction Preliminary Injunction filed by Santis Produce, LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Preliminary Injunction) (Stokes, Craig) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Order to Show Cause , MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order () filed by Santis Produce, LLC (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Plaintiff's Representative in Support of Motion, #2 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Show Cause) (Stokes, Craig) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Mibo Fresh Foods, LLC, Sabas Montalvo, Uzor U. Nwoko. (edm) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (edm) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Santis Produce, LLC. (Stokes, Craig) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mibo Fresh Foods, LLC, Sabas Montalvo, Uzor U. Nwoko filed by Santis Produce, LLC. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10297829) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Open Invoices, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Stokes, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.