CTAF Solutions, LLC v. Genesys Aerosystems Group, Inc.
CTAF Solutions, LLC |
Genesys Aerosystems Group, Inc., and Genesys Aerosystems Group, Inc. |
4:2019cv00860 |
October 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Property Rights: Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer Genesys Aerosystems Group, Inc. answer due 1/7/2019. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 12/6/2019) (trt) |
Filing 14 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Genesys Aerosystems Group, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Zembek, Richard) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eric Conley Green on behalf of Genesys Aerosystems Group, Inc.. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Green, Eric) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Hao Jimmy Wu on behalf of Genesys Aerosystems Group, Inc.. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Wu, Hao) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Richard S Zembek on behalf of Genesys Aerosystems Group, Inc.. (Filer will update contact info in ECF.) (Zembek, Richard) |
Filing 10 ORDER: After considering the motion, and noting that it is unopposed, the Court finds that it should be and is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, Defendant has until December 8, 2019 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/5/2019) (skg) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer the Complaint by CTAF Solutions, LLC. (Johnson, Jay) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Genesys Aerosystems Group, Inc. ; served on 10/18/2019. (Johnson, Jay) |
Filing 7 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff CTAF Solutions, LLC. (Johnson, Jay) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Genesys Aerosystems Group, Inc. (tln) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by CTAF Solutions, LLC. (Johnson, Jay) |
Filing 4 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (tln) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (tln) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by CTAF Solutions, LLC. (Johnson, Jay) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Genesys Aerosystems Group, Inc., filed by CTAF Solutions, LLC. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10328375) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit B) (Johnson, Jay) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.