Ferguson v. Chung et al
Plaintiff: Justin Ferguson
Defendant: Suk Rye Chung and SVP MDO, LLC
Case Number: 4:2019cv00865
Filed: October 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: John McBryde
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to #1 Complaint. Suk Rye Chung answer due 12/12/2019; SVP MDO, LLC answer due 12/12/2019. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 11/13/2019) (tln)
November 13, 2019 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to SVP MDO, LLC; served on 10/22/2019. (tln)
November 13, 2019 Filing 12 DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT filed by Suk Rye Chung, SVP MDO, LLC. (tln)
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Order Unfiling #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Suk Rye Chung, SVP MDO, LLC due to the following deficiency: The motion is signed by a law firm in violation of the court'sstanding order and the undersigned's judge-specific requirements. The court ORDERS that defendants' unopposed motion to extend time be, and is hereby, stricken from the record and unfiled. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 11/12/2019)
November 12, 2019 Filing 10 *** UNFILED AND STRICKEN PER #11 ORDER*** Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Suk Rye Chung, SVP MDO, LLC. (edm) Modified on 11/12/2019 (edm).
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order Unfiling #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Suk Rye Chung, SVP MDO, LLC due to the following deficiency: This case is not designated for electronic filing. All documents should be filed in traditional paper form, bearing the original signature of the filer. Because of such defect, the court has determined that the document indicated above should be unfiled from the record. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 11/12/2019) (edm)
November 8, 2019 Filing 8 *** UNFILED PER ORDER #9 *** Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Suk Rye Chung, SVP MDO, LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Gordan Truong added to party Suk Rye Chung(pty:dft), Attorney Gordan Truong added to party SVP MDO, LLC(pty:dft) (Truong, Gordan) Modified on 11/12/2019 (edm).
October 25, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Suk Rye Chung ; served on 10/14/2019. (edm)
October 15, 2019 Filing 6 Received original and judge's copy of case initiating documents pursuant to Standing Order re: #1 Complaint #2 Cert. Of Interested Persons/Disclosure Statement filed by Justin Ferguson (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (wrb)
October 11, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Suk Rye Chung, SVP MDO, LLC. (edm)
October 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 10/11/2019) (edm)
October 11, 2019 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to Judge McBryde. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (edm)
October 10, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Justin Ferguson. (Schapiro, Douglas)
October 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Suk Rye Chung, SVP MDO, LLC filed by Justin Ferguson. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10331617) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Schapiro, Douglas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ferguson v. Chung et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Suk Rye Chung
Represented By: Jennifer L Owen
Represented By: Gordan Truong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SVP MDO, LLC
Represented By: Jennifer L Owen
Represented By: Gordan Truong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Justin Ferguson
Represented By: Douglas S Schapiro
Represented By: Emil Lippe, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?