Seigler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
| Maria Seigler |
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a Walmart Supercenter #963 and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
| 4:2019cv00998 |
| November 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| John McBryde |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Notice of Appearance of Counsel for Defendant by Daniel A Ortega on behalf of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (wxc) |
Filing 8
ORDER... The court ORDERS that by 4:00p.m. on January 24, 2020, plaintiff show cause why she has failed to comply with the court's December 26, 2019 order and why her claims and causes of action against defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. D/B/A Walmart Supercenter #963, should not be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 1/21/2020) (wxc)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ramona Martinez for Daniel A. Ortega on behalf of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Martinez, Ramona) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR REPLEADING: The court ORDERS that by January 10, 2020, plaintiff file an amended pleading to be titled "Plaintiff's Amended Complaint" in compliance with the pleading requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure' and the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and the judge-specific requirements of the undersigned, and that by January 24, 2020, defendant file an answer or other response to such Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 12/26/2019) (npk)
|
| Filing 5 Judge McBryde's paper original and copies pursuant to the standing order of documents #1 , #2 received. (wxc) |
|
Filing 4
Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 11/26/2019) (wxc)
|
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to Judge McBryde. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (wxc) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a Walmart Supercenter #963. (Martinez, Ramona) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 43rd District Court, Parker County, case number CV19-1719 filed by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a Walmart Supercenter #963. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10439678) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A index, #2 Exhibit(s) B state docket, #3 Exhibit(s) C state pldgs, #4 Exhibit(s) D discl stmt, #5 Cover Sheet, #6 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Martinez, Ramona) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
