Elkins v. Warden et al
Petitioner: Franklin Robert Elkins
Respondent: Warden, Office of the Attorney General of the State of Texas and Lorie Davis
Case Number: 4:2019cv01036
Filed: December 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 FINAL JUDGMENT. In accordance with its order of dismissal signed this day, the Court DISMISSES the petition of Franklin Robert Elkins pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 in the above-captioned action for lack of prosecution. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/6/2020) (trt)
February 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. For the reasons discussed herein, Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/6/2020) (trt)
February 6, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9, 10. Thu Feb 6 14:14:43 CST 2020 (crt)
January 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER of USCA No. 19-11388 as to #6 Notice of Appeal, filed by Franklin Robert Elkins. The court has dismissed the above referenced appeal as being erroneously docketed. [ Erroneously docketed as a Notice of Appeal]. (tle)
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO PAY FILING FEE: Therefore, his Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #4 is DENIED. Payment of the $5.00 filing fee must be submitted to the clerk of Court within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 12/19/2019) (skg)
December 19, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Copy of Notice of Appeal mailed to Petitioner Thu Dec 19 09:03:03 CST 2019 (crt)
December 19, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Thu Dec 19 14:03:28 CST 2019 (crt)
December 18, 2019 Filing 6 District Court's Copy of Petition for Certificate of Appealability and Notice of Appeal filed at the Texas State Court of Criminal Appeals by Franklin Robert Elkins. (npk) NOTE: The State Court Records have not been filed as Respondent has not yet filed an answer. Modified on 12/19/2019 to reflect the SCR have not yet been filed (ctf). Modified on 1/7/2020 [ Erroneously docketed as a Notice of Appeal] (tle).
December 18, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Franklin Robert Elkins (npk)
December 18, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Franklin Robert Elkins (npk)
December 18, 2019 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability on appeal re #6 Notice of Appeal, filed by Franklin Robert Elkins. [ No image see #6 ]. (npk)
December 17, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Tue Dec 17 10:46:38 CST 2019 (crt)
December 16, 2019 Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (bdb)
December 16, 2019 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: If the last digit of this case is a 0 route file to staff attorney ARH. If the last digit is a 1-9, route file to staff attorney PW. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (bdb)
December 16, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Franklin Robert Elkins. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elkins v. Warden et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Franklin Robert Elkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Office of the Attorney General of the State of Texas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?