Williams et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
| Laurie Williams and George Williams |
| U.S. Bank, N.A., Successor Trustee to LaSalle Bank National Association, On Behalf Of The Holders Of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2007-HE7, Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2007-HE7 and U.S. Bank, N.A. |
| 4:2019cv01050 |
| December 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial on this Court's four-week docket beginning 4/19/2021 before Judge Mark Pittman. Joinder of Parties due by 4/10/2020. Amended Pleadings due by 4/10/2020. In accordance with the Court's Civil Justice Expense and Delay Reduction Plan, the Court hereby REFERS this case to mediation and APPOINTS Senator William C Meier, Ret. as the mediator in this case. Deadline for mediation is on or before 10/21/2020. Discovery due by 11/20/2020. Motions due by 12/21/2020. Pretrial Materials/Order due by 3/25/2021. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 2/10/2020) (tln)
|
| Filing 13 Proposal for contents of scheduling and discovery order by U.S. Bank, N.A.. (Hord, Michael) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's Original Counterclaims for Judgment Authorizing Foreclosure against George Williams, Laurie Williams filed by U.S. Bank, N.A. (tln) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Before the Court is Defendant, U.S. Bank, N.A., successor trustee to LaSalle Bank National Association, on behalf of the holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2007-HE7, Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2007-HE7's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Counterclaims. ECF No. #9 . Having considered the motion, the Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Clerk is ORDERED to file Defendant's Original Counterclaims for Judgment Authorizing Foreclosure, attached to the Motion as ECF No. 9-1, as a separate docket entry. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/21/2020) (tln)
|
| Filing 10 AMENDED Certificate of Conference to #9 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Counterclaims by U.S. Bank, N.A. (Hord, Michael) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Counterclaims filed by U.S. Bank, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Hord, Michael) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Foster Hord, Jr for Olyn Poole on behalf of U.S. Bank, N.A.. (Hord, Michael) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Before the Court is Defendant U.S. Bank N.A.'s Motion for Leave to Proceed without Local Counsel (ECF No. #5 ), filed January 3, 2020. Having considered the Motion, the Court finds that it should be and is hereby DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/7/2020) (bdb)
|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by U.S. Bank, N.A.. (Hord, Michael) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Without Local Counsel filed by U.S. Bank, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hord, Michael) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: Lead counsel for each party and any unrepresented party shall confer as soon as practicable, but in any event no later than January 24, 2020. The Joint Report shall be filed on or before January 31, 2020. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/20/2019) (bdb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Within twenty-one (21) days of this order, Defendant shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 83.10(a). Failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions and/or Defendant's pleadings being stricken and default taken against Defendant without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/20/2019) (bdb)
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (bdb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 67th Judicial District Court, Tarrant County, TX, case number 067-313536-19 filed by U.S. Bank, N.A., Successor Trustee to LaSalle Bank National Association, On Behalf Of The Holders Of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2007-HE7, Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2007-HE7. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10492332) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) C-1, #5 Exhibit(s) C-2, #6 Exhibit(s) D, #7 Cover Sheet, #8 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Hord, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
