Ripley et al v. State Farm LLoyds
Melissa Ripley and Allen Ripley |
State Farm LLoyds |
4:2019cv01066 |
December 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
John McBryde |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE OF FIRM CHANGE filed by State Farm LLoyds on behalf of Neil Rambin. (npk) |
Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against State Farm LLoyds filed by Melissa Ripley, Allen Ripley. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (npk) |
Filing 6 ORDER FOR REPLEADING: The court ORDERS that by February 13, 2020, plaintiffs file an amended pleading to be titled "Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint" in compliance with the pleading requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and the judge-specific requirements of the undersigned, and that by February 27, 2020, defendant file an answer or other response to such Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint in compliance with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and the judge-specific requirements of the undersigned. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 1/30/2020) (tln) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by State Farm LLoyds. (npk) |
Filing 4 Judge McBryde's paper original and copy received pursuant to Standing Order re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by State Farm LLoyds (npk) |
Filing 3 Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 12/27/2019) (npk) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to Judge McBryde. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (npk) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 96th Judicial Dist., Tarrant County, case number 096-313549-19 filed by State Farm LLoyds. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10505605) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Exhibit(s) A, #4 Exhibit(s) B, #5 Exhibit(s) C, #6 Exhibit(s) D, #7 Exhibit(s) E, #8 Exhibit(s) F, #9 Exhibit(s) G) (Rambin, W) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.