Nieswiadomy et al v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
Plaintiff: STEPHEN NIESWIADOMY and RONDENA NIESWIADOMY
Defendant: Shellpoint Partners LLC and Ditech Financial LLC
Case Number: 4:2019cv01068
Filed: December 30, 2019
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2020 Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Shellpoint Partners LLC re: #7 First MOTION to Remand to State Court (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Gutierrez, Melissa)
February 27, 2020 Filing 12 REPLY filed by Rondena Nieswiadomy, Stephen Nieswiadomy re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss (Davis, Alex)
February 27, 2020 Filing 11 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Rondena Nieswiadomy, Stephen Nieswiadomy re #9 First MOTION to Amend/Correct (Davis, Alex)
February 27, 2020 Filing 10 First MOTION to Amend/Correct #9 First MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Rondena Nieswiadomy, Stephen Nieswiadomy (Davis, Alex)
February 27, 2020 Filing 9 First MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Rondena Nieswiadomy, Stephen Nieswiadomy with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Davis, Alex)
February 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: To more quickly resolve this dispute, the Court ORDERS expedited briefing on both motions #5 and #7 . See Order for further specifics. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/13/2020) (skg)
February 13, 2020 Filing 7 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Rondena Nieswiadomy, Stephen Nieswiadomy with Brief/Memorandum in Support. Attorney Alex L Davis, III added to party Rondena Nieswiadomy(pty:pla), Attorney Alex L Davis, III added to party Stephen Nieswiadomy(pty:pla) (Davis, Alex)
February 13, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Thu Feb 13 15:54:45 CST 2020 (crt)
January 6, 2020 Filing 6 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Shellpoint Partners LLC re #5 MOTION to Dismiss (Gutierrez, Melissa)
January 6, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Shellpoint Partners LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Gutierrez, Melissa)
January 6, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by E Sawyer Neely on behalf of Shellpoint Partners LLC. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Neely, E)
December 30, 2019 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (bdb)
December 30, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Shellpoint Partners LLC. (Gutierrez, Melissa)
December 30, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from 141st Judicial District Court of Tarrant County, case number 141-309584-19 filed by Shellpoint Partners LLC. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10508414) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) A, #3 Exhibit(s) B, #4 Exhibit(s) C) (Gutierrez, Melissa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nieswiadomy et al v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STEPHEN NIESWIADOMY
Represented By: Alex L Davis, III
Represented By: Alex R. Hernandez, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RONDENA NIESWIADOMY
Represented By: Alex L Davis, III
Represented By: Alex R. Hernandez, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shellpoint Partners LLC
Represented By: Melissa S Gutierrez
Represented By: Keith S Anderson
Represented By: E Sawyer Neely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ditech Financial LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?