Ruff v. Ruff et al
Suzann Ruff |
Aramar Holdings LLC, Michael A Ruff, 7R Owners Association, Inc., Premium Sandstone LLC and Mark Ruff |
4:2020cv00178 |
February 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Torts/Pers Prop: Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 Remand letter to the 29th District Court of Palo Pinto County, Texas. (Attachments: #1 Order to Remand, #2 Docket Sheet) (wxc) |
Filing 22 ORDER granting #10 ...Before the Court is Plaintiff Suzann Ruffs (Suzann) Motion to Remand (ECF No. 10), Defendant Michael A. Ruffs (Mike) Response (ECF No. 15), Defendant Mark Ruffs (Mark) Response (ECF No. 16) and Suzanns Reply (ECF No. 17). Having considered the motion, related briefing, and applicable law, the Court finds that Plaintiffs Motion to Remand should be and is hereby GRANTED. Suzanns claims are hereby REMANDED to the 29th District Court, Palo Pinto County. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/22/2020) (wxc) (Main Document 22 replaced on 4/22/2020) (bdb). |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:22. Wed Apr 22 14:02:12 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Filing 21 Mail returned as undeliverable. #18 Order received back from Craig A. Jackson as Return to Sender- Attempted not Known-Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (wxc) |
Filing 20 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #19 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Mark Donheiser. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/9/2020) (chmb)IBH |
Filing 19 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Mark Donheiser (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-10743154) filed by Suzann Ruff (Mathis, Randal) |
Filing 18 ORDER...Local Rule 83.9(a) allows a licensed attorney who is not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas to represent a party in proceedings in this court only by permission of the presiding judge. See N.D. Tex. R. 83.9(a). A review of the record reveals that Mark M Donheiser is not admitted in the Northern District of Texas, has not requested permission to represent his/her client, and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 83.9(a). Accordingly, within fourteen days of this order, Mark M Donheiser shall file an application to proceed pro hac vice, or otherwise comply with Local Rule 83.9(a). Failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions and/or a ban from practicing in the Northern District of Texas. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/30/2020) (wxc) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:18. Mon Mar 30 11:33:33 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Filing 17 REPLY filed by Suzann Ruff re: #12 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing,, (Mathis, Randal) |
Filing 16 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Mark Ruff re #12 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing,, (Hall, Jeffrey) |
Filing 15 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Michael A Ruff re #12 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing,, Mike's Brief on Federal Question Jurisdiction (Ruff, Michael) |
Filing 14 Mail returned as undeliverable. #12 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing,, received back from Craig A. Jackson as Return to Sender, Insufficient Address, Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (wxc) |
Filing 13 Mail returned as undeliverable. #8 , #9 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party received back from Craig A. Jackson as Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. Chambers is advised of USPS-provided forwarding address via this docket text. Current document not re-mailed (chambers to request update of docket and/or re-mailing if appropriate). (wxc) |
Filing 12 ORDER... Therefore, Defendants are ORDERED to file a brief on or before March 16, 2020, that justifies the removal of this case based on federal question jurisdiction. Furthermore, Defendants are ORDERED to justify their assertion that the notice of removal was timely. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to reply to said brief on or before March 30, 2020. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions and/or the dismissal of this case without prejudice and without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/2/2020) (wxc) |
Filing 11 Appendix in Support filed by Suzann Ruff re #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Mathis, Randal) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Suzann Ruff with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Mathis, Randal) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Mon Mar 2 15:04:18 CST 2020 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8,9. Thu Feb 27 12:44:15 CST 2020 (crt) |
Filing 9 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wxc) |
Filing 8 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (wxc) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Mark Ruff. (Filer fee note- Clerk to add prior fee payment info here.) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) E-171, #2 Exhibit(s) E-172, #3 Exhibit(s) E-173, #4 Exhibit(s) E-174, #5 Exhibit(s) E-175, #6 Exhibit(s) E-176, #7 Exhibit(s) E-177, #8 Exhibit(s) E-178, #9 Exhibit(s) E-179, #10 Exhibit(s) E-180, #11 Exhibit(s) E-181, #12 Exhibit(s) E-182, #13 Exhibit(s) E-183, #14 Exhibit(s) E-184, #15 Exhibit(s) E-185, #16 Exhibit(s) E-186, #17 Exhibit(s) E-187, #18 Exhibit(s) E-188, #19 Exhibit(s) E-189, #20 Exhibit(s) E-190, #21 Exhibit(s) E-191, #22 Exhibit(s) E-192, #23 Exhibit(s) E-193, #24 Exhibit(s) E-194, #25 Exhibit(s) E-195, #26 Exhibit(s) E-196, #27 Exhibit(s) E-197, #28 Exhibit(s) E-198, #29 Exhibit(s) E-199, #30 Exhibit(s) E-200, #31 Exhibit(s) E-201, #32 Exhibit(s) E-202, #33 Exhibit(s) E-203, #34 Exhibit(s) E-204) (Hall, Jeffrey) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Mark Ruff. (Filer fee note- Clerk to add prior fee payment info here.) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) E-141, #2 Exhibit(s) E-142, #3 Exhibit(s) E-143, #4 Exhibit(s) E-144, #5 Exhibit(s) E-145, #6 Exhibit(s) E-146, #7 Exhibit(s) E-147, #8 Exhibit(s) E-148, #9 Exhibit(s) E-149, #10 Exhibit(s) E-150, #11 Exhibit(s) E-151, #12 Exhibit(s) E-152, #13 Exhibit(s) E-153, #14 Exhibit(s) E-154, #15 Exhibit(s) E-155, #16 Exhibit(s) E-156, #17 Exhibit(s) E-157, #18 Exhibit(s) E-158, #19 Exhibit(s) E-159, #20 Exhibit(s) E-160, #21 Exhibit(s) E-161, #22 Exhibit(s) E-162, #23 Exhibit(s) E-163, #24 Exhibit(s) E-164, #25 Exhibit(s) E-165, #26 Exhibit(s) E-166, #27 Exhibit(s) E-167, #28 Exhibit(s) E-168, #29 Exhibit(s) E-169, #30 Exhibit(s) E-170) (Hall, Jeffrey) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Mark Ruff. (Filer fee note- Clerk to add prior fee payment info here.) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) E-111, #2 Exhibit(s) E-112, #3 Exhibit(s) E-113, #4 Exhibit(s) E-114, #5 Exhibit(s) E-115, #6 Exhibit(s) E-116, #7 Exhibit(s) E-117, #8 Exhibit(s) E-118, #9 Exhibit(s) E-119, #10 Exhibit(s) E-120, #11 Exhibit(s) E-121, #12 Exhibit(s) E-122, #13 Exhibit(s) E-123, #14 Exhibit(s) E-124, #15 Exhibit(s) E-125, #16 Exhibit(s) E-126, #17 Exhibit(s) E-127, #18 Exhibit(s) E-128, #19 Exhibit(s) E-129, #20 Exhibit(s) E-130, #21 Exhibit(s) E-131, #22 Exhibit(s) E-132, #23 Exhibit(s) E-133, #24 Exhibit(s) E-134, #25 Exhibit(s) E-135, #26 Exhibit(s) E-136, #27 Exhibit(s) E-137, #28 Exhibit(s) E-138, #29 Exhibit(s) E-139, #30 Exhibit(s) E-140) (Hall, Jeffrey) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Mark Ruff. (Filer fee note- Clerk to add prior fee payment info here.) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) E-81, #2 Exhibit(s) E-82, #3 Exhibit(s) E-83, #4 Exhibit(s) E-84, #5 Exhibit(s) E-85, #6 Exhibit(s) E-86, #7 Exhibit(s) E-87, #8 Exhibit(s) E-88, #9 Exhibit(s) E-89, #10 Exhibit(s) E-90, #11 Exhibit(s) E-91, #12 Exhibit(s) E-92, #13 Exhibit(s) E-93, #14 Exhibit(s) E-94, #15 Exhibit(s) E-95, #16 Exhibit(s) E-96, #17 Exhibit(s) E-97, #18 Exhibit(s) E-98, #19 Exhibit(s) E-99, #20 Exhibit(s) E-100, #21 Exhibit(s) E-101, #22 Exhibit(s) E-102, #23 Exhibit(s) E-104, #24 Exhibit(s) E-105, #25 Exhibit(s) E-106, #26 Exhibit(s) E-107, #27 Exhibit(s) E-108, #28 Exhibit(s) E-109, #29 Exhibit(s) E-110) (Hall, Jeffrey) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Mark Ruff. (Filer fee note- Clerk to add prior fee payment info here.) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) E-51, #2 Exhibit(s) E-52, #3 Exhibit(s) E-53, #4 Exhibit(s) E-54, #5 Exhibit(s) E-55, #6 Exhibit(s) E-56, #7 Exhibit(s) E-57, #8 Exhibit(s) E-58, #9 Exhibit(s) E-61, #10 Exhibit(s) E-62, #11 Exhibit(s) E-63, #12 Exhibit(s) E-64, #13 Exhibit(s) E-65, #14 Exhibit(s) E-66, #15 Exhibit(s) E-67, #16 Exhibit(s) E-68, #17 Exhibit(s) E-69, #18 Exhibit(s) E-70, #19 Exhibit(s) E-71, #20 Exhibit(s) E-72, #21 Exhibit(s) E-73, #22 Exhibit(s) E-74, #23 Exhibit(s) E-75, #24 Exhibit(s) E-76, #25 Exhibit(s) E-77, #26 Exhibit(s) E-78, #27 Exhibit(s) E-79, #28 Exhibit(s) E-80) (Hall, Jeffrey) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Mark Ruff. (Filer fee note- Clerk to add prior fee payment info here.) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) E-21, #2 Exhibit(s) E-22, #3 Exhibit(s) E-23, #4 Exhibit(s) E-24, #5 Exhibit(s) E-25, #6 Exhibit(s) E-26, #7 Exhibit(s) E-27, #8 Exhibit(s) E-28, #9 Exhibit(s) E-29, #10 Exhibit(s) E-30, #11 Exhibit(s) E-31, #12 Exhibit(s) E-32, #13 Exhibit(s) E-33, #14 Exhibit(s) E-34, #15 Exhibit(s) E-35, #16 Exhibit(s) E-36, #17 Exhibit(s) E-37, #18 Exhibit(s) E-38, #19 Exhibit(s) E-39, #20 Exhibit(s) E-40, #21 Exhibit(s) E-41, #22 Exhibit(s) E-42, #23 Exhibit(s) E-43, #24 Exhibit(s) E-44, #25 Exhibit(s) E-45, #26 Exhibit(s) E-46, #27 Exhibit(s) E-47, #28 Exhibit(s) E-48, #29 Exhibit(s) E-49, #30 Exhibit(s) E-50) (Hall, Jeffrey) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from 29th District Court, Palo Pinto County, case number C-46164 filed by Mark Ruff. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10655271) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) A, #3 Exhibit(s) B, #4 Exhibit(s) C, #5 Exhibit(s) D, #6 Exhibit(s) E, #7 Exhibit(s) E-1, #8 Exhibit(s) E-2, #9 Exhibit(s) E-3, #10 Exhibit(s) E-3a, #11 Exhibit(s) E-4, #12 Exhibit(s) E-5, #13 Exhibit(s) E-6, #14 Exhibit(s) E-7, #15 Exhibit(s) E-8, #16 Exhibit(s) E-9, #17 Exhibit(s) E-10, #18 Exhibit(s) E-11, #19 Exhibit(s) E-12, #20 Exhibit(s) E-13, #21 Exhibit(s) E-14, #22 Exhibit(s) E-15, #23 Exhibit(s) E-17, #24 Exhibit(s) E-18, #25 Exhibit(s) E-19, #26 Exhibit(s) E-20) (Hall, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.