Galderma Laboratories, L.P. v. RX Plus LLC et al
| Galderma Laboratories, L.P. and Galderma Laboratories LP |
| Elisa Valenti, Louise Gatti and RX Plus LLC |
| 4:2020cv00194 |
| February 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Torts/Pers Prop: Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
FINAL JUDGMENT: This Judgment is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a). The Plaintiff notified the Court that it voluntarily dismissed this case without prejudice. See ECF No. #12 . It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/15/2020) (pef)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Dismissal Without Prejudice filed by Galderma Laboratories LP (Drawhorn, Lauren) |
| Filing 11 SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY Upon the Record as to RX Plus, LLC and Louise Gatti by Galderma Laboratories LP. (Drawhorn, Lauren) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue filed by Galderma Laboratories LP (Drawhorn, Lauren) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Louise Gatti ; served on 4/4/2020. (Parker, Schyler) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to RX Plus LLC ; served on 4/4/2020. (Parker, Schyler) |
| Filing 7 Appendix in Support filed by Elisa Valenti re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue (Hafer, Douglas) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue filed by Elisa Valenti Attorney Douglas R Hafer added to party Elisa Valenti(pty:dft) (Hafer, Douglas) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Elisa Valenti ; served on 3/9/2020. (Drez, David) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Louise Gatti, RX Plus LLC, Elisa Valenti. (wxc) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (wxc) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Galderma Laboratories, L.P.. (Drez, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Galderma Laboratories, L.P.. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10664201) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Drez, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
