Matranga v. Saul
Plaintiff: Thomas Matranga
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Case Number: 4:2020cv00220
Filed: March 7, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey L Cureton
Referring Judge: John McBryde
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 402
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the stipulation of voluntary dismissal filed by plaintiff, Thomas Matranga, the court ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES that all claims and causes of action brought by plaintiff against defendant, Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, in the above-captioned action be, and are hereby, dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 3/12/2020) (tln)
March 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RETURNING ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: The above-styled and numbered action was automatically referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to a standing order of this Court. On March 11, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal [doc. #7 ]. Consequently, the undersigned deems it appropriate to return this action to the United States District Judge for further action as deemed appropriate. Based on the foregoing, it is ORDERED that the above-styled and numbered action, previously referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for findings, conclusions and recommendation, be and hereby is returned to the docket of the United States District Judge for further action as deemed appropriate. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 3/12/2020) (tln)
March 11, 2020 Filing 8 Judge McBryde's paper original and copy pursuant to standing order re: #1 Complaint, #2 Cert. Of Interested Persons/Disclosure Statement, #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Thomas Matranga. (tln)
March 11, 2020 Filing 7 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Thomas Matranga. (tln)
March 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER PERMITTING FILING IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND ORDER REGARDING COMPLETION OF SUMMONS AND ISSUANCE OF PROCESS: The above named Plaintiff is authorized to proceed with the commencement of this civil suit without prepayment of fees or the necessity of giving security therefor, such that the motion/application to proceed in forma pauperis [docket no. #3 ] be, and is hereby, GRANTED. (6 - summons forms and 3 - 285 forms mailed to attorney for plaintiff.) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 3/10/2020) (tln)
March 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 3/9/2020) (tln)
March 9, 2020 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. File to staff attorney DK. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (tln)
March 7, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Thomas Matranga (Attachments: #1 Affidavit(s)) (Honig, Ronald)
March 7, 2020 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Thomas Matranga. (Honig, Ronald)
March 7, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul filed by Thomas Matranga. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Honig, Ronald)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matranga v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Matranga
Represented By: Ronald D Honig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?