Claudia Hecht vs David Karl Newren
CLAUDIA HECHT |
DAVID KARL NEWREN |
4:2020cv00251 |
March 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Torts/Pers Prop: Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 FINAL JUDGMENT... This Judgment is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a). TheCourt dismissed this case due to lack of personal jurisdiction. See ECF No. 8. It is thereforeORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this case is DISMISSED withoutprejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/27/2020) (wrb) |
Filing 8 ORDER: The authority to hear and decide a case is an absolute necessity and a foundational principle of the U.S. court system. In a case such as this, where the connection to Texas is weak and the relationship between the connection and the litigation is even weaker, it is abundantly clear to the Court, and hopefully to the plaintiff, that the Court does not have personal jurisdiction over this case. Accordingly, the Court finds this matter should be andhereby is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/27/2020) (wrb) |
Filing 7 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by CLAUDIA HECHT re #6 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing, (Attachments: #1 Declaration(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E) (Espinoza, Edmundo) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Upon reviewing the allegations in the complaint, the court finds that additional briefing is required as to the issue of jurisdiction in this case. On or before March 26 2020, Plaintiff shall file a brief demonstrating to the Court how it has both subject matter and personal jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/19/2020) (wrb) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to DAVID KARL NEWREN. (wrb) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (wrb) |
Filing 3 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Complaint filed by CLAUDIA HECHT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2) (Espinoza, Edmundo) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by CLAUDIA HECHT. (Espinoza, Edmundo) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against DAVID KARL NEWREN filed by CLAUDIA HECHT. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10709987) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Espinoza, Edmundo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Claudia Hecht vs David Karl Newren | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CLAUDIA HECHT | |
Represented By: | Edmundo Espinoza |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DAVID KARL NEWREN | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.