Galderma Laboratories, L.P. v. CRx Pharmacy, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Galderma Laboratories, L.P. and Galderma Laboratories LP
Defendant: Jiyang Chung and CRx Pharmacy, LLC
Case Number: 4:2020cv00258
Filed: March 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Terry R Means
Referring Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Prop: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: Before the Court is Defendants' second Unopposed Motion for Extension in which to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF No. #14 ). Having reviewed the Motion and current status of this case, the Court finds it appropriate to extend the deadline to answer or otherwise respond. Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS in part the request for an extension of time and Defendants are ORDERED to answer or otherwise respond on or before June 1, 2020. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/15/2020) (tln)
May 14, 2020 Filing 14 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer Or Otherwise Respond to First Amended Complaint filed by CRx Pharmacy, LLC, Jiyang Chung (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Levitt, Jonathan)
May 4, 2020 Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against CRx Pharmacy, LLC, Jiyang Chung filed by Galderma Laboratories LP. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Drez, David)
April 28, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eric L Scott on behalf of CRx Pharmacy, LLC, Jiyang Chung. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Scott, Eric)
April 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER...A review of the record reveals that Defendants are not in compliance with Local Rule 83.10(a). Accordingly, within fourteen days of this order, defendants shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 83.10(a). Failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions and/or defendants pleadings being stricken and default taken against defendants without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/20/2020) (wxc)
April 20, 2020 Filing 10 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (wxc)
April 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF TRANSFER... After review of this matter, and because Judge Mark T. Pittman is already handling several similar cases, the Court concludes that this matter should be and hereby is TRANSFERRED to the docket of Judge Pittman. All future filings in this case shall bear at the end of the case number the suffix letter P instead of Y. Case reassigned to Judge Mark Pittman for all further proceedings. Senior Judge Terry R Means no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 4/17/2020) (wxc)
April 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME #7 ... Pending before the Court is the Agreed Motion for Extension in Which to File an Amended Complaint and Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (doc. 7). After review of the motion, the Court concludes that it should be and hereby is GRANTED. As a result, Plaintiff shall have until May 4, 2020, to file its First Amended Complaint. Defendants shall have until May 18, 2020, to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 4/13/2020) (wxc)
April 9, 2020 Filing 7 Agreed MOTION to Extend Time to File an Amended Complaint and Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Galderma Laboratories LP (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Parker, Schyler)
April 7, 2020 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Jiyang Chung ; served on 3/23/2020. (Drez, David)
April 7, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to CRx Pharmacy, LLC ; served on 3/23/2020. (Drez, David)
March 20, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to CRx Pharmacy, LLC, Jiyang Chung. (wxc)
March 19, 2020 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Means. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (wxc)
March 19, 2020 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Galderma Laboratories, L.P.. (Drez, David)
March 19, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Galderma Laboratories, L.P.. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10712461) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Drez, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Galderma Laboratories, L.P. v. CRx Pharmacy, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jiyang Chung
Represented By: Jonathan E Levitt
Represented By: Eric L Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CRx Pharmacy, LLC
Represented By: Jonathan E Levitt
Represented By: Eric L Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Galderma Laboratories, L.P.
Represented By: Lauren Kessler Drawhorn
Represented By: Schyler Paige Parker
Represented By: David J Drez, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Galderma Laboratories LP
Represented By: David J Drez, III
Represented By: Schyler Paige Parker
Represented By: Lauren Kessler Drawhorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?