Crenshaw v. Saul
Annie Y Crenshaw |
Andrew Saul |
Social Security Administration - Interested Party |
4:2020cv00347 |
April 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Hal R Ray |
Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wxc) |
Filing 8 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr. (wxc) |
Filing 7 Order transferring case to the Fort Worth Division of the Northern District of Texas. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 4/15/2020) (mcrd) |
Filing 6 Notice of Deficiency and Order: The application is not signed. Please submit a properly signed motion or application to proceed in forma pauperis within 14 days of the date of this order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 4/15/2020) (mcrd) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8,9. Wed Apr 15 14:59:29 CDT 2020 (crt) |
New case number 4:20-cv-00347-O Crenshaw v. Saul has been opened following the order of transfer entered in case number 3:20cv0859-L. Future filings should be made in the FORT WORTH division and reflect the new case number as indicated. Clerk to complete new case processing and mail notice of this entry to any party who did not receive it electronically. (ldm) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4,6,7. Wed Apr 15 09:13:28 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Annie Y Crenshaw. (jmg) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Annie Y Crenshaw. (jmg) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, Social Security Administration - Interested Party filed by Annie Y Crenshaw. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jmg) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jmg) |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. 1, 2 Tue Apr 14 14:33:25 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.