Indian Rubber Company, Inc. v. Erie M & P Company, Inc. d/b/a Erie Mill and Press Company
Indian Rubber Company, Inc. |
Erie M & P Company, Inc. d/b/a Erie Mill and Press Company and Erie M & P Company Inc |
4:2020cv00446 |
May 7, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Contract: Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 DEFAULT JUDGMENT granting #12 Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 12 in favor of Indian Rubber Company, Inc. against Erie M & P Company Inc. Plaintiff Indian Rubber Company shall recover from Defendant Erie M & P Company, Inc. d/b/a Erie Mill and Press Company, the following: $40,500 in economic damages; $121,500 in statutory damages; $400 in costs of court; and pre-judgment interest at the rate of 5%. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 6/30/2020) (npk) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Default Judgment. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 6/30/2020) (npk) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Default Judgment against Erie M & P Company Inc filed by Indian Rubber Company, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Appendix of Evidence, #2 Proposed Order Final Default Judgment) (Goodman, David) |
Filing 10 ORDER: Accordingly, the Court directs Plaintiff to move for default judgment on or before 12:00 p.m. on June 30, 2020. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 6/25/2020) (tln) |
Filing 9 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Erie M & P Company Inc (npk) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Document re: Default by Clerk by Indian Rubber Company, Inc. re #7 Notice (Other) (Goodman, David) Modified on 6/25/2020 (npk). |
Filing 7 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT filed by Indian Rubber Company, Inc. (Goodman, David) Modified on 6/24/2020 (npk). |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to All Defendants. (Goodman, David) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Erie M & P Company Inc. (npk) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (npk) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Indian Rubber Company, Inc.. (Goodman, David) |
Filing 2 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Complaint,,,, by Plaintiff Indian Rubber Company, Inc.. (Goodman, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Indian Rubber Company, Inc.. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10822674) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Goodman, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.