Maxwell et al v. The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity et al
| Ashley Maxwell and Zach Maxwell |
| The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity, Texas Equal Access Fund and The Afiya Center |
| 4:2020cv00928 |
| August 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Other Statutes: Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Letter of Remand to the 355th District Court of Hood County with Order and Docket sheet. (wxc) |
Filing 17
ORDER... Based on the foregoing reasons, the Court lacks jurisdiction over this case; thus, the Court GRANTS in part Plaintiffs Motion to Remand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447 and denies their request for attorneys fees. It is therefore ORDERED that this case be REMANDED to the District Court of the 355th District in Hood County, Texas. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/2/2020) (wxc)
|
| Civil Case Terminated per Order #17 (wxc) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Ashley Maxwell, Zach Maxwell re: #15 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Replyin Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Mitchell, Jonathan) |
| Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Replyin Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand filed by Texas Equal Access Fund, The Afiya Center, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Defendants' Sur-Reply in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand) (Ecklund, Jennifer) |
| Filing 14 REPLY filed by Ashley Maxwell, Zach Maxwell re: #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Mitchell, Jonathan) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Texas Equal Access Fund, The Afiya Center, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity re: #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Ecklund, Jennifer) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ashley Maxwell, Zach Maxwell (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Mitchell, Jonathan) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Texas Equal Access Fund, The Afiya Center, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Ecklund, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER...Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion to Remand to State Court (ECF No. 9), filed August 17, 2020. To resolve this motion in a timely fashion, the Court ORDERS Defendants to respond by August 24, 2020. The Court further ORDERS Plaintiffs to reply by August 26, 2020. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 8/18/2020) (wxc)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Ashley Maxwell, Zach Maxwell with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support, #2 Proposed Order) (Mitchell, Jonathan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by H Dustin Fillmore, III on behalf of Ashley Maxwell, Zach Maxwell. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Fillmore, H) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan F Mitchell on behalf of Ashley Maxwell, Zach Maxwell. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Mitchell, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (wxc) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case filed by Texas Equal Access Fund, The Afiya Center, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity (Ecklund, Jennifer) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Texas Equal Access Fund, The Afiya Center, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity. (Ecklund, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Texas Equal Access Fund, The Afiya Center, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity. (Ecklund, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 Administrative Record consisting of State court papers Index of Documents filed by Texas Equal Access Fund, The Afiya Center, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) B - Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) C - Original Petition, #3 Exhibit(s) D - Citations) (Ecklund, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity, The Afiya Center. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-11081826) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Cover Sheet/Supplement, #2 Exhibit(s) A - Index of Documents, #3 Exhibit(s) B - Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit(s) C - Original Petition, #5 Exhibit(s) D - Citations) (Ecklund, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
