Vrabel v. The Prudential Insurance Agency, LLC et al
| Paul Vrabel |
| The Prudential Insurance Agency, LLC, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation and The Prudential Insurance Company of America |
| 4:2020cv01030 |
| September 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Labor: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Joint STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL of Defendant Six Flags Entertainment Corporation by The Prudential Insurance Agency, LLC. (Oestreich, Hailey) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Before the Court is an Agreed Motion to Extend Time for Defendant The Prudential Insurance Agency, LLC f/k/a The Prudential Insurance Company of America to Answer or Respond (ECF No. #5 ) and Defendant Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's Unopposed Motion to File Answer or Response (ECF No. #6 ). Having considered the Motions, the Court finds that they should be and are hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED Defendants' deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby extended up to and including November 17, 2020. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/30/2020) (tln)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Vanessa Griffith added to party Six Flags Entertainment Corporation(pty:dft) (Griffith, Vanessa) |
| Filing 5 Agreed MOTION to Extend Time To Answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by The Prudential Insurance Agency, LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Hailey Oestreich added to party The Prudential Insurance Agency, LLC(pty:dft) (Oestreich, Hailey) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, The Prudential Insurance Agency, LLC. (tln) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (tln) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Paul Vrabel. (Brantley, Rickey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, The Prudential Insurance Agency, LLC filed by Paul Vrabel. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-11178138) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Brantley, Rickey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
