Ward v. State of Texas
| Robert Lewis Ward |
| State of Texas, State of Missouri, State of New Mexico, State of Delaware, State of Kentucky, State of Mississippi, State of Oregon, State of Georgia, State of Hawaii, State of Alabama, State of New York, State of Idaho, State of Maryland, State of Alaska, State of Indiana, State of New Hampshire, State of Illinois, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Nevada, State of Florida, State of Kansas, State of North Carolina, State of Massachusetts, State of California, State of Michigan, State of New Jersey, State of Minnesota, State of North Dakota, State of Oklahoma, State of Louisiana, State of Iowa, State of Arizona, State of Ohio, State of Montana, State of Maine and State of Arkansas |
| Rondale R. Wright |
| 4:2020cv01065 |
| September 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
FILING FEE ORDER: Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 such that his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #6 ) is GRANTED. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall, when funds exist in plaintiff's inmate trust account, forward to the Court an initial partial filing fee of $54.63. Plaintiff shall pay $295.37, the balance of the filing fee, in monthly installments as provided in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). Clerk to mail this order to the attention of the Inmate Trust Fund Department at the facility where the inmate resides. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/13/2020) (pef)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. #12 Order mailed to the Inmate Accounting Office at Tarrant County Jail. Fri Nov 13 12:21:48 CST 2020 (crt) |
|
Filing 11
SECOND ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Robert Lewis Ward must address the following deficiency: Although Ward supplied an in-forma-pauperis motion, he did not provide a certificate of inmate trust account. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 20 days. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/9/2020) (bdb)
|
| Filing 10 Correspondence filed by Robert Lewis Ward (mmw) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Mon Nov 9 16:31:32 CST 2020 (crt) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER severing #8 Motion to Suspend the actions of the courts, criminal district attorney and sheriff's department of Tarrant County as to Plaintiff Rondale R. Wright. (New cause number 4:20-cv-01205-O assigned) (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/3/2020) (npk)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Tue Nov 3 15:03:31 CST 2020 (crt) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Suspend the actions of the courts, criminal district attorney and sheriff's department of Tarrant County filed by intervenor plaintiff Rondale R. Wright (npk) |
| Filing 7 Public correspondence addressed to U.S. Attorney, Northern District received from Robert Lewis Ward. (wxc) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Robert Lewis Ward (npk) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Robert Lewis Ward. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Additional Defendants to be added)(npk) |
|
Filing 4
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Robert Lewis Ward must address the following deficiency: pay the full amount of a filing fee. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days days. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/28/2020) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s), #2 Additional Page(s)) (wxc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Mon Sep 28 11:45:16 CDT 2020 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (npk) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (npk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of Texas filed by Robert Lewis Ward. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (npk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/28/2020: #1 mailing envelope) (npk). |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2,3. Fri Sep 25 14:43:15 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
