Hopper v. Federal Medical Center Carswell
Case Number: 4:2020cv01208
Filed: July 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Fort Worth Office
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: It is ORDERED that Hopper's motion /request for appointment of counsel included within her response (ECF No. 27 ) is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that defendant Aimee Gardner's motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 24 ) is GRANTED, such that all plaintiff Hopper's remaining claims against Aimee Gardner are DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/10/2022) (twd)
July 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 OPINION and ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A & 1915(e)(2)(B)... It is therefore ORDERED that all of plaintiff Polly Hoppers claims for relief, except for one claim against Counselor Gardner for deliberate indifference to her serious medical needs under the Eighth Amendment, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under authority of 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 7/27/2021) (wxc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hopper v. Federal Medical Center Carswell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?