Govender v. City of Blue Mound, Texas
Sagren Kevin Govender |
City of Blue Mound, Texas |
ADR Provider |
4:2020cv01249 |
November 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Other Statutes: Constitutionality of State Statutes |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 NOTICE of Initial Disclosures filed by City of Blue Mound, Texas (Klement, Christopher) |
Filing 14 SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial on this Court's four-week docket beginning 1/10/2022 before Judge Mark Pittman. Joinder of Parties due by 3/5/2021. Amended Pleadings due by 3/5/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 9/10/2021. Deadline for mediation is on or before 4/2/2021. Discovery due by 8/13/2021. Pretrial Materials/Order due by 12/16/2021. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/5/2021) (tln) |
Filing 13 Joint STATUS REPORT Regarding Contents of Scheduling Order filed by City of Blue Mound, Texas. (Noga, Darrell) |
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Mark Pittman: Status Conference held on 12/16/2020. Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - K. Michael Sturgill; Defense - Darrell G-M Noga. (Court Reporter: Debbie Saenz) (No exhibits) Time in Court - :20. (chmb) |
Filing 11 ORDER...The Court hereby RESETS this hearing to now occur at 2:15 p.m. on December 16, 2020, in the Fourth Floor Courtroom of the Eldon B. Mahon United States Courthouse, located at 501 W. 10th Street, Fort Worth, Texas. Lead counsel are ORDERED to attend. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/16/2020) (wxc) |
Filing 10 ORDER: Before the Court is briefing from the parties (ECF Nos. #6 , #7 ), which includes Plaintiff's brief in support of remand (ECF No. 6). These briefs were filed in response to the Court's Order (ECF No. #5 ) that raised certain jurisdictional concerns. Having considered the briefing, the Court finds it appropriate to set this matter for a 30-minute, in-person hearing at 1:30 p.m. on December 16, 2020, in the Fourth Floor Courtroom of the Eldon B. Mahon United States Courthouse, located at 501 W. 10th Street, Fort Worth, Texas. Lead counsel are ORDERED to attend. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/11/2020) (npk) |
Filing 9 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: The Joint Report shall be filed on or before December 30, 2020. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/9/2020) (tln) |
Filing 8 ORDER: The undersigned agrees with Judge Lindsay's approach and accordingly concludes that if Govender does not seek to assert a federal claim against Blue Mound, he must file an amended pleading by December 4, 2020, omitting any reference to the United States Constitution and not asserting any federal law as a basis for federal jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/1/2020) (tln) |
Filing 7 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by City of Blue Mound, Texas re #1 Notice of Removal (Klement, Christopher) |
Filing 6 PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REMAND filed by Sagren Kevin Govender re #5 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing,, (Sturgill, K) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Therefore, both parties are ORDERED to file a brief - not to exceed 10 pages - on or before November 23, 2020, that addresses the removal of this case based on federal question jurisdiction and the Court's concerns explained above. The parties are ORDERED to file responses - not to exceed 10 pages - to said briefs on or before December 1, 2020. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, and/or the dismissal of this case without prejudice, and/or remand of this case, without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 11/18/2020) (tln) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Wed Nov 18 11:47:49 CST 2020 (crt) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (tln) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by City of Blue Mound, Texas. (Noga, Darrell) |
Filing 2 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Notice of Removal,,,, by Defendant City of Blue Mound, Texas. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Noga, Darrell) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by City of Blue Mound, Texas. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-11363969) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s)) (Noga, Darrell) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Tue Nov 17 13:01:05 CST 2020 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.