First Command Bank v. United States of America
First Command Bank |
United States of America |
4:2020cv01254 |
November 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Federal Tax Suits: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 FINAL JUDGMENT: This Final Judgment is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. In accordance with the Order dismissing the case (ECF No. #12 ): It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this civil action is DISMISSED with PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/25/2021) (pef) |
Filing 12 ORDER: Before the Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to File Stipulation of Dismissal. ECF No. #11 . The Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is DENIED. Based on the parties' representations to the Court, the Court finds that the case should be and hereby is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/25/2021) (pef) |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time Deadline(), MOTION for Extension of Time to File Stipulation of Dismissal filed by United States of America (Johns, Michelle) |
Filing 10 ORDER: The Court finds that the #9 Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, all deadlines are STAYED. The Clerk of this Court is DIRECTED to administratively close this case and remove it from the statistical records. Nothing in this Order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this case. The Parties are ORDERED to file a joint stipulation of dismissal on before June 1, 2021. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/2/2021) (pef) |
Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Deadlines filed by United States of America (Johns, Michelle) |
Filing 8 ORDER: Before the Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Answer Deadline. ECF No. #7 . The Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, Defendant shall submit an answer or other responsive pleading on or before March 1, 2021. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/19/2021) (pef) |
Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Michelle C Johns added to party United States of America(pty:dft) (Johns, Michelle) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joshua David Smeltzer on behalf of First Command Bank. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Smeltzer, Joshua) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by First Command Bank identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate First Command Financial Services, Inc. for First Command Bank. (Rhodus, G) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by First Command Bank. (Rhodus, G) |
Clerk declines to issue summons as requested in entry #4 . See doc #3 for previously issued summons. (pef) |
Filing 3 Summons issued as to United States of America, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (pef) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (pef) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against United States of America filed by First Command Bank. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-11369258) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) EXHIBIT A, #3 Exhibit(s) EXHIBIT B, #4 Exhibit(s) EXHIBIT C, #5 Exhibit(s) EXHIBIT D, #6 Additional Page(s) SUMMONS) (Rhodus, G) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: First Command Bank v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: First Command Bank | |
Represented By: | David Cameron Gair |
Represented By: | G Tomas Rhodus |
Represented By: | Joshua David Smeltzer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Not classified by court: United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.