Esquivel v. USA
| Eduardo Torres Esquivel |
| USA |
| 4:2020cv01280 |
| December 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: It is therefore ORDERED that Esquivel shall, by no later than February 12, 2021, file a response reciting any arguments as to why his motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 should not be dismissed as filed beyond the time allowed. Failure to timely respond to this order by February 12, 2021, could result in the summary dismissal of the 2255 motion without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/12/2021) (tln)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Jan 12 11:16:25 CST 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 5 Memorandum in Support filed by Eduardo Torres Esquivel re #4 Amended Document. (tln) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Eduardo Torres Esquivel. Amendment to #1 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (tln) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wxc) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER...The Clerk of Court is directed to open a new civil action (nature of suit code 510, motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence) and to follow standard case assignment and referral procedures for a Section 2255 motion. This order shall be docketed in the criminal case and in the civil case. The Clerk of Court shall update the docket entry at ECF No. 239 to reflect that this is a Section 2255 proceeding. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 12/1/2020) (wxc)
|
| Filing 1 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 4:13-CR-188-O) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wxc) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2,3. Tue Dec 1 14:04:04 CST 2020 (crt) |
| New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: staff attorney DK. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (wxc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Esquivel v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Eduardo Torres Esquivel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
