CPSC I Limited Partnership v. HAC, Inc.
| CPSC I Limited Partnership doing business as College Park Shopping Center |
| HAC, Inc. |
| 4:2020cv01295 |
| December 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Real Property: Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Agreed Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), all claims, counterclaims, and cross-claims that have been, or could have been, filed in this case are DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear its respective costs of court and attorney's fees. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/26/2021) (tln)
|
| Filing 15 Agreed MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by CPSC I Limited Partnership (Hill, Frank) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against HAC, Inc. filed by CPSC I Limited Partnership. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (tln) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Amend its Complaint. The Clerk is directed to file Plaintiff's proposed Amended Complaint (ECF No. #6 -1) attached to its Motion. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/19/2021) (tln)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE AND OBJECTION filed by HAC, Inc. re: #6 MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Smith, Spencer) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Rule 11 Agreement Re Pending Motions in State Court filed by HAC, Inc. (Smith, Spencer) |
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 1/12/2021. Amended Pleadings due by 1/12/2021. Motions due by 4/30/2021. Deadline for mediation is on or before 3/3/2021. Discovery due by 4/2/2021. Pretrial Order due by 8/5/2021. This case is set for trial on this Court's four-week docket beginningAugust 30, 2021. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/2/2021) (mmw) (Main Document 10 replaced on 1/4/2021) (mmw). Modified on 1/4/2021 (mmw).
|
| Filing 9 Joint Submission on Discovery Matters Regarding Contents of Scheduling Order by CPSC I Limited Partnership. (Hill, Frank) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by CPSC I Limited Partnership on Keri Redford (Hill, Frank) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by CPSC I Limited Partnership on Ted Brooks (Hill, Frank) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by CPSC I Limited Partnership (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amendment) (Hill, Frank) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Take Deposition of Designated Representative of HAC, Inc. by CPSC I Limited Partnership. (Hill, Frank) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: Proposed Scheduling Order due by 1/4/2021. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 12/4/2020) (npk)
|
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (bdb) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by HAC, Inc.. (Smith, Spencer) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by HAC, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-11410908) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 - Index, #2 Exhibit(s) 2 - Docket-Parker County, #3 Exhibit(s) 3 - Plaintiff's Original Petition, #4 Exhibit(s) 4 - Kiker's Answer, #5 Exhibit(s) 5 - HAC's Answer, #6 Exhibit(s) 6 - Agreed Scheduling Order, #7 Exhibit(s) 7 - HAC's MPSJ, #8 Exhibit(s) 8 - HAC Notice of Hearing, #9 Exhibit(s) 9 - Kiker's Motion for Mediation, #10 Exhibit(s) 10 - Proposed Order granting Mediation, #11 Exhibit(s) 11 - Pltf Resp to HAC MPSJ, #12 Exhibit(s) 12 - HAC Reply to MPSJ, #13 Exhibit(s) 13 - Pltf Notice of Non-Suit of Kiker, #14 Exhibit(s) 14 - Proposed Order of Dismissal of Kiker, #15 Exhibit(s) 15 - Proposed Order Deny MPSJ, #16 Exhibit(s) 16 - Pltf Ltr to Judge Towson, #17 Exhibit(s) 17 - Proposed Order Granting MPSJ, #18 Exhibit(s) 18 - Order Denying MPSJ, #19 Exhibit(s) 19 - Plt's MPSJ, #20 Exhibit(s) 20 - Pltf Notice of Hearing, #21 Exhibit(s) 21 - Pltf's First Amended Petition, #22 Exhibit(s) 22 - HAC Cert of Interested Parties, #23 Cover Sheet, #24 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Smith, Spencer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
