Tatum v. Brickell Financial Services Motor Club, Inc. et al
| Carlton Tatum |
| Sing for Service, LLC an Illinois Corporation doing business as MEPCO and Brickell Financial Services Motor Club, Inc. a Florida Corporation doing business as Road America Motor Club |
| 4:2020cv01296 |
| December 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Hal R Ray |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (npk) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Ray preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (npk) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Brickell Financial Services Motor Club, Inc. (npk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Brickell Financial Services Motor Club, Inc., Sing for Service, LLC filed by Carlton Tatum. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number FW035424 & FW035425) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (npk) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Fri Dec 4 16:06:07 CST 2020 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tatum v. Brickell Financial Services Motor Club, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carlton Tatum | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sing for Service, LLC an Illinois Corporation doing business as MEPCO | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Brickell Financial Services Motor Club, Inc. a Florida Corporation doing business as Road America Motor Club | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
