Ricks v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Cedric Allen Ricks |
Director, TDCJ-CID |
4:2020cv01299 |
December 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL AND SETTING DEADLINES: Ricks' motion for appointment of counsel, filed December 4, 2020, (ECF no. #1 ), is GRANTED. Attorney Jeremy Schepers and the Capital Habeas Unit of the Federal Public Defender for the Northern District of Texas is appointed counsel of record for Ricks. On or before November 17, 2021, Ricks shall file, and serve on the Criminal Appeals Division of the Office of the Texas Attorney General, his federal habeas corpus petition in this cause. Respondent shall file his answer to Ricks' federal habeas corpus or other responsive pleading on or before ninety days after receipt of a copy of Ricks' federal habeas corpus petition. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/4/2021) (bdb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Rachel Leigh Patton on behalf of Director, TDCJ-CID. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Patton, Rachel) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: staff attorney PW. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (tln) |
Filing 1 MOTION to appoint the federal public defender (death penalty case) filed by petitioner Cedric Allen Ricks. (Filing fee $5.00; receipt number FW035426) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (tln) Modified text on 12/6/2020 (lrl). |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2. Fri Dec 4 15:55:07 CST 2020 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ricks v. Director, TDCJ-CID | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Cedric Allen Ricks | |
Represented By: | Catherine Clare Bernhard |
Represented By: | Jeremy Don Schepers-FPD |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID | |
Represented By: | Edward L Marshall |
Represented By: | Rachel Leigh Patton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.