Jimenez v. Wilson
| Ramon Luis Jimenez |
| Eric D. Wilson |
| 4:2020cv01367 |
| December 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with its opinion and order signed this day, the petition of Ramon L. Jimenez pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim for relief in part and DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in part. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/6/2021) (bdb)
|
|
Filing 6
OPINION AND ORDER: Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim for relief as to his first claim and dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as to his second claim. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/6/2021) (bdb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6, 7. Wed Jan 6 13:26:03 CST 2021 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Tue Dec 29 08:45:20 CST 2020 (crt) |
| Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wxc) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: staff attorney PW. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (wxc) |
| Filing 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ramon Luis Jimenez (wxc) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) filed by Ramon Luis Jimenez. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wxc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jimenez v. Wilson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ramon Luis Jimenez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Eric D. Wilson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
