KAT Industries, Inc. v. Maxum Enterprises, LLC
| KAT Industries, Inc. |
| Maxum Enterprises, LLC doing business as Pilot Thomas Logistics |
| ADR Provider |
| 4:2021cv00067 |
| January 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Counterclaim filed by KAT Industries, Inc.. Related document: #12 Answer to Complaint,,,, Counterclaim,,, Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (Furlong, Michael) |
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for 5/9/2022 before Judge Mark Pittman. Joinder of Parties due by 6/28/2021. Amended Pleadings due by 6/28/2021. Deadline for mediation is on or before 11/10/2021. Discovery due by 12/10/2021. Motions due by 1/10/2022. Pretrial Order due by 4/14/2022. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/29/2021) (wxc)
|
| Filing 14 Joint STATUS REPORT Regarding Contents of Scheduling Order filed by KAT Industries, Inc.. (Moore, Michael) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Maxum Enterprises, LLC identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate PTC Maxum Holdings, LLC for Maxum Enterprises, LLC. (Early, Joanne) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,,,, with Jury Demand filed by Maxum Enterprises, LLC. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice., COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs filed by Maxum Enterprises, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit B) (Early, Joanne) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER denying #7 ...Before the Court is Defendants Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. ECF No. 7. Having considered the Motion, the record, and applicable law, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/13/2021) (wxc)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER...The Joint Report, which shall be filed on or before April 27, 2021. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/13/2021) (wxc)
|
| Filing 9 Appendix in Support filed by Maxum Enterprises, LLC re #7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, #8 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C) (Early, Joanne) |
| Filing 8 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Maxum Enterprises, LLC re #7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Early, Joanne) |
| Filing 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Maxum Enterprises, LLC Attorney Joanne Early added to party Maxum Enterprises, LLC(pty:dft) (Early, Joanne) |
|
Filing 6
Order Unfiling #5 due to the following deficiency: The parties cannot stipulate to an extended deadline. Instead, they must seek the Court's approval through an appropriately filed Motion to Extend. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/16/2021) (wxc)
|
| Filing 5 *** UNFILED PER ORDER #6 *** STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE DEADLINE by Maxum Enterprises, LLC. (Marx, Brandon) Modified on 3/16/2021 (wxc). |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Maxum Enterprises, LLC. Waiver sent on 1/25/2021. (Moore, Michael) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (wxc) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by KAT Industries, Inc.. (Davis, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Maxum Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Pilot Thomas Logistics filed by KAT Industries, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-11531008) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Non-Disclosure Agreement, #2 Exhibit(s) Invoice, #3 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Cover Sheet Supplement Attachment to Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
