Baker v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff: Shlonda Baker
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: ADR Provider
Case Number: 4:2021cv00116
Filed: February 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2021 Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Barbour, Justin)
March 29, 2021 Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by United Parcel Service, Inc. re: #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Appendix, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Schmoyer, Shannon)
March 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial on this Court's four-week docket beginning 3/29/2022 before Judge Mark Pittman. Joinder of Parties due by 5/17/2021. Amended Pleadings due by 5/17/2021. Deadline for mediation is on or before 11/12/2021. Discovery due by 10/15/2021. Motions due by 11/12/2021. Pretrial Materials/Order due by 3/4/2022. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/18/2021) (tln)
March 17, 2021 Filing 9 Joint STATUS REPORT REGARDING CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER filed by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Schmoyer, Shannon)
March 8, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Shlonda Baker with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Gilmore, Jamie)
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Plaintiff's Amended complaint due by 3/18/2021. Answer due from United Parcel Service, Inc. on 4/9/2021. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 2/24/2021) (npk)
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Joint Proposed Scheduling Order due by 3/19/2021. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 2/24/2021) (npk)
February 23, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ian Brinton Hatch on behalf of United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Hatch, Ian)
February 4, 2021 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Shlonda Baker. (filed within state court; see #1 ) (npk)
February 4, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Shlonda Baker. (Gilmore, Jamie)
February 4, 2021 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Schmoyer, Shannon)
February 4, 2021 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (npk)
February 4, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-11580448) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit(s) Index of Matters Being Filed, #4 Exhibit(s) List of All Counsel of Record, #5 Exhibit(s) 1, #6 Exhibit(s) 2, #7 Exhibit(s) 3, #8 Exhibit(s) 4, #9 Exhibit(s) 5, #10 Exhibit(s) 6, #11 Exhibit(s) 7, #12 Exhibit(s) 8, #13 Exhibit(s) 9, #14 Exhibit(s) 10, #15 Exhibit(s) 11, #16 Exhibit(s) 12, #17 Exhibit(s) 13, #18 Exhibit(s) 14, #19 Exhibit(s) 15) (Schmoyer, Shannon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baker v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Represented By: Marcia N Jackson
Represented By: Justin Barbour
Represented By: Christine E. Reinhard
Represented By: Shannon B. Schmoyer
Represented By: Ian Brinton Hatch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shlonda Baker
Represented By: Jamie Jean Gilmore
Represented By: Brittney Lynne Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: ADR Provider
Represented By: Wade H McMullen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?