Loper v. Wright Medical Technology Inc et al
Plaintiff: Gwendolyn Loper
Defendant: Wright Medical Group, Inc. and Wright Medical Technology Inc
Case Number: 4:2021cv00136
Filed: February 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Inj: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Pers Inj/Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ELECTRONIC ORDER finding as moot #5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 3/9/2021) (chmb)(lcmhn)
March 9, 2021 Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL by Wright Medical Technology Inc. (Wohlford, Lucas)
March 9, 2021 Civil Case Terminated. (npk)
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Before the Court is the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Defendant Wright Medical Group, Inc. (ECF No. #6 ), filed February 23, 2021. Accordingly, the claims against Defendant Wright Medical Group, Inc. are hereby dismissed without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/24/2021) (npk)
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC ORDER finding as moot #4 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/24/2021) (chmb)
February 23, 2021 Filing 6 Joint STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL of Defendant Wright Medical Group, Inc. by Wright Medical Group, Inc., Wright Medical Technology Inc. (Wohlford, Lucas)
February 16, 2021 Filing 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Wright Medical Group, Inc., Wright Medical Technology Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Unpublished Cases Cited, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss)Attorney Lucas C Wohlford added to party Wright Medical Technology Inc(pty:dft) (Wohlford, Lucas) Modified on 2/24/2021 (npk).
February 16, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Wright Medical Group, Inc. with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Declaration(s) Appendix-Daurer Declaration, #2 Exhibit(s) Unpublished Cases Cited, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss)Attorney Lucas C Wohlford added to party Wright Medical Group, Inc.(pty:dft) (Wohlford, Lucas)
February 9, 2021 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (npk)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: Lead counsel for each party and any unrepresented party shall confer as soon as practicable, but in any event no later than February 23, 2021. The Joint Report shall be filed on or before March 9, 2021. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/9/2021) (bdb)
February 8, 2021 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wright Medical Group, Inc., Wright Medical Technology Inc. [filed within #1 ; see for image] (npk)
February 8, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Wright Medical Technology Inc, Wright Medical Group, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-11590724) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C) (Weideman, Corey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Loper v. Wright Medical Technology Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Represented By: Corey M Weideman
Represented By: Lucas C Wohlford
Represented By: Sean K Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wright Medical Technology Inc
Represented By: Corey M Weideman
Represented By: Lucas C Wohlford
Represented By: Sean K Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gwendolyn Loper
Represented By: Daniel J Smith
Represented By: Michael H Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?