Palomino v. Department of the Army
Francisco Palomino, Jr. |
Department of the Army |
4:2021cv00531 |
April 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Hal R Ray |
Civil Rights: Employment |
10 U.S.C. ยง 1552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Department of the Army served on 5/3/2021 ; U.S. Attorney General served on 5/17/2021. (mmw) |
Filing 6 Summons issued as to Department of the Army, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (mmw) |
Filing 5 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Francisco Palomino, Jr. (mmw) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Because he paid the filing fee, the plaintiff is now responsible for serving the defendant with a summons and a copy of the complaint in this case as provided by Rule 4(c) and 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If the plaintiff does not file a valid return of service or otherwise show that the defendant was properly served, this action may be dismissed as to any defendant who was not properly served. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 4/15/2021) (mmw) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. summons (x3) and copy of FRCP 4 Thu Apr 15 14:18:07 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Ray preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of the Army filed by Francisco Palomino, Jr. (Filing fee $402.00; Receipt number FW036060) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Mon Apr 12 13:42:28 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Palomino v. Department of the Army | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Department of the Army | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Francisco Palomino, Jr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.