Harper v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
Keishonna Harper |
Lockheed Martin Corp |
4:2021cv00571 |
April 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Fort Worth Office |
Reed C O'Connor |
Civil Rights: Employment |
42 U.S.C. § 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:25. Fri Jun 4 12:15:54 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 25 SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 8/2/2021. Amended Pleadings due by 8/2/2021. Motions due by 12/20/2021. Deadline for mediation is on or before 10/20/2021. Discovery due by 11/19/2021. Pretrial Order due by 3/24/2022. This case is set for trial on this Court's four-week docket beginning April 18, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 6/3/2021) (mmw) |
Filing 24 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Lockheed Martin Corp. (Prude, Micah) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael S Alfred on behalf of Keishonna Harper. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Alfred, Michael) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert Scott Oswald on behalf of Keishonna Harper. (Filer will update contact info in ECF.) (Oswald, Robert) |
Filing 21 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: The Joint Report shall be filed on or before June 2, 2021. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 5/5/2021) (mmw) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:21. Wed May 5 09:48:51 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 20 ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by Lockheed Martin Corp. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (Prude, Micah) |
Filing 19 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw) |
Filing 18 Case electronically transferred in from District of Maryland; Case Number 8:20-cv-03715. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:19. Wed Apr 21 10:18:43 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 17 ORDER Granting #12 to Transfer Venue; directing the Clerk to Transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Forth Worth Division, and thereafter close the case; defendant's Motion to Dismiss is otherwise moot. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 4/20/2021. (heps, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 4/20/2021. (heps, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Filing 15 PAPERLESS NOTICE OF SCHEDULING OF MOTIONS HEARING and advising counsel/parties of record that oral argument on #12 Defendants Motion to Dismiss will be heard before Judge Peter J. Messitte on Thursday, May 6, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. via ZoomGov. The parties will be allotted one and one-half (1 1/2) hours for total argument. Counsel should advise in writing immediately if they expect oral argument to exceed the allotted time frame. PLEASE ALSO NOTE: Counsel should mail or hand deliver copies of the principal cases on which they intend to rely during oral argument to the Courthouse by no later than Monday, May 3, 2021. Please also highlight the appropriate text.(jmhs, Chambers) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue or Alternatively to Transfer Venue filed by Lockheed Martin Corp..(Waterworth, Gregory) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue or Alternatively to Transfer Venue filed by Keishonna Harper. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Attachment 1 (Affidavit of Keishonna Harper))(Kruse, Kellee) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue or Alternatively to Transfer Venue by Lockheed Martin Corp. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Britney Collver)(Waterworth, Gregory) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Micah Prude. Directing attorney Micah Prude to register online for CM/ECF at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-registration. Signed by Clerk on 1/29/2021. (srd, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Filing 10 ORDER Granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Lockheed Martin Corp. answer due 2/8/2021.. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 1/26/2021. (heps, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Toyja E Kelley on behalf of Lockheed Martin Corp. (Kelley, Toyja) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Filing 8 CORRECTED MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Micah R. Prude by Lockheed Martin Corp.. The fee has already been paid.(Waterworth, Gregory) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Filing 7 QC NOTICE: #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by Lockheed Martin Corp. needs to be modified. See attachment for details and corrective actions needed regarding the signature(s) on the motion. (srd, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint unopposed by Plaintiff and filed by Lockheed Martin Corp. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Waterworth, Gregory) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Micah R. Prude (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-9075325.) by Lockheed Martin Corp.(Waterworth, Gregory) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory Lee Waterworth on behalf of Lockheed Martin Corp. (Waterworth, Gregory) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keishonna Harper. Lockheed Martin Corp. served on 1/4/2021, answer due 1/25/2021.(Kruse, Kellee) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Lockheed Martin Corp.(jf3s, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lockheed Martin Corporation ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9026809.), filed by Keishonna Harper. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Kruse, Kellee) [Transferred from Maryland on 4/21/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.