Stidam et al v. Nguyen et al
Dale Stidam and Shelia Stidam |
Dieu Nguyen and I B N Transport LLC |
4:2021cv00574 |
April 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Letter of Remand to the 348th Judicial District Court of Tarrant County, Texas re: #6 ORDER. (pef) |
Filing 6 ORDER: It is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice and the case REMANDED to the 348th Judicial District Court of Tarrant County, Texas. The Clerk is INSTRUCTED to mail a certified copy of this Order to the District Clerk of Tarrant County, Texas. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/5/2021) (pef) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Shelia Stidam, Dale Stidam. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Nohinek, John) |
Filing 4 ORDER...Therefore, the Court ORDERS that: (1) on or before May 5, 2021, Plaintiff file an amended complaint that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and the undersigneds judge-specific requirements; and, (2) on or before May 12, 2021, each defendant file an answer or other response to the amended complaint. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/21/2021) (wxc) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (pef) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Dale Stidam, Shelia Stidam. (See document #2 -1 for image) (pef) |
Filing 2 PLEADINGS FILED IN THE STATE COURT ACTION by I B N Transport LLC, Dieu Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s)) (Miller, J) Modified document title and filers on 4/21/2021 (pef). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Dieu Nguyen, I B N Transport LLC. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-11816766) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Miller, J) Modified filers on 4/21/2021 (pef). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.