Patino v. USA
Angelica Jimenez Patino |
USA |
4:2021cv00609 |
April 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Notice of Substitution of Counsel by AUSA. Stephen S Gilstrap added as AUSA. (Gilstrap, Stephen) |
Filing 6 ORDER denying #4 Motion for Discovery and Production of Documents Pursuant to Rule 6 Governing 28 USC 2255 Proceedings. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/11/2021) (tln) |
Filing 5 ORDER AND INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES IN A MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255: The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the motion and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. The United States attorney shall, within 60 days from the date of this order, file an answer, motion, or other response to the motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255. Defendant may file a reply within 30 days following service of the answer, any motion, or other responsive pleading of the United States. The #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied as unnecessary. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/11/2021) (t |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5,6. Tue May 11 13:49:40 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 4 Motion for Discovery and Production of Documents Pursuant to Rule 6 Governing 28 USC 2255 Proceedings filed by Angelica Jimenez Patino. (pef) |
Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (pef) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Angelica Jimenez Patino. (pef) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 4:19-cr-00364-P-20) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (pef) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Fri Apr 30 16:15:42 CDT 2021 (crt) |
New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (pef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Patino v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Represented By: | Leigha A Simonton-DOJ |
Represented By: | Stephen S Gilstrap |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Angelica Jimenez Patino | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.