Sanchez v. Whole Foods Market et al
Gabriel Sanchez |
Whole Foods Market and Oscar Doe |
4:2021cv00626 |
May 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Wed May 26 12:56:29 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Civil Case Terminated. (npk) |
Filing 12 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. Because Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed this case, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 5/25/2021) (chmb)(lcmhn) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Gabriel Sanchez (npk) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gabriel Sanchez (npk) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Oscar Doe, Whole Foods Market. (Henderson, Valerie) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 5/13/2021) (npk) |
Filing 7 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Whole Foods Market re #6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Henderson, Valerie) |
Filing 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Whole Foods Market (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Henderson, Valerie) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File to Appear without Local Counsel filed by Whole Foods Market (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Henderson, Valerie) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Thu May 13 15:24:17 CDT 2021 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Fri May 7 12:36:28 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: Joint Report due by 6/3/2021. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 5/6/2021) (npk) |
Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (npk) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. [not ref per chmb] (npk) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Oscar Doe, Whole Foods Market. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-11870661) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Cover Sheet, #5 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Henderson, Valerie) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Thu May 6 15:43:29 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.