Iro v. Carr
| Nnena Iro |
| Michael Carr |
| 4:2021cv00632 |
| May 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER PERMITTING PROCEEDING IN THE DISTRICT COURT ANDSPECIFYING FURTHER ACTION BY THE CLERK OF COURT: Responsive pleadings must be filed by him within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. Deadline to reply to the answer is 30 days. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 5/19/2021) (mmw)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Wed May 19 10:18:12 CDT 2021 (crt)
|
|
Filing 5
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Nnena Iro must address the following deficiency: A $5.00 filing fee has not been paid nor has a proper application to proceed in forma pauperis been submitted. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 5/7/2021) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Inmate Trust Account) (mmw)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Fri May 7 09:53:11 CDT 2021 (crt)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sre)
|
|
Filing 3
New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: staff attorney PW. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (sre)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Nnena Iro. (sre)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Nnena Iro. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (sre)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Thu May 6 16:24:01 CDT 2021 (crt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Iro v. Carr | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Michael Carr | |
| Represented By: | Ann Cruce-Haag-DOJ |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Nnena Iro | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
