Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Anthony Wayne Johnson
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 4:2021cv00704
Filed: June 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Administrative Record consisting of State court papers filed by Director, TDCJ-CID. (Attachments: #1 DA01_Tarrant-1459735R-RR-Vol001, #2 DA02_Tarrant-1459735R-RR-Vol002, #3 DA03_Tarrant-1459735R-RR-Vol003, #4 DA04_Tarrant-1459735R-RR-Vol004, #5 DA05_Tarrant-1459735R-RR-Vol005, #6 DA06_RR-Vol006, #7 DA08_Tarrrant-1459735-RR-1Supp, #8 DA09_Clerk's Record, #9 DA10_00218_JOHNSON_Anthony_Sts_BF, #10 DA11_00218 Anthony Wayne Johnson app brief, #11 DA12_00218 Johnson Mandate, #12 DA13_00218 Johnson Opinion and Judgment, #13 DA14_2nd COA TRANSFER ORDER 072616, #14 DA15_SUP CT TRANSFER ORDER 062116, #15 DA16_16264CR DOCKET SHEET 061821DA16_16264CR DOCKET SHEET 061821, #16 DA17_NOA CDC2 1459735R JOHNSON, #17 DA18_PD-0959-17 EXT PDR, #18 DA19_PD-0959-17 ORIGINAL PDR, #19 DA20_PD-0959-17 PDR RECEIVED, #20 DA21_PD-0959-17 RETURNED TO COA COURT 11-21-2017, #21 SH01_WR-92,080-01 ACTION TAKEN WRIT 2-3-2021, #22 SH02_WR-92,080-01 SUPP CLERK RECORD 12-8-2020, #23 SH03_WR-92,080-01 WRIT RECEIVED WRIT 12-2-2020) (Cockshutt, Willa)
July 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RESPONSE with Brief in Support to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,, filed by Director, TDCJ-CID. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (Cockshutt, Willa) Modified docket text on 7/28/2021 (pef).
June 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Willa Eleanor Cockshutt on behalf of Director, TDCJ-CID. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Cockshutt, Willa)
June 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Acknowledgment of Electronic Service by Director, TDCJ-CID re #2 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion, #6 Order to Show Cause/Order to Answer, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Petition, supporting documents, if any, and Order(s) received by Office of Attorney General of Texas. Laura L Haney 6/3/2021. (pef)
June 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER PERMITTING PROCEEDING IN THE DISTRICT COURT and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, NOTICE, AND INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES: Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #3 ) is GRANTED. Respondent is directed to file an answer to this petition within 60 days of the date of this order. Deadline to reply to the answer is 30 days. The clerk will electronically serve this order, the petition, and supporting documents to the designee for the Office of the Texas Attorney General. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 6/3/2021) (pef)
June 3, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Thu Jun 3 09:44:24 CDT 2021 (crt)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Wed Jun 2 08:54:08 CDT 2021 (crt)
June 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (pef)
June 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: staff attorney PW. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (pef)
June 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Anthony Wayne Johnson. (pef)
June 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Memorandum Brief in Support of #1 2254 Petition filed by Anthony Wayne Johnson. (pef)
June 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Anthony Wayne Johnson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (pef)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Represented By: Willa Eleanor Cockshutt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony Wayne Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?