Mann v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: William M. Mann
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID, Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles Div., B. P. P. Huntsville Parole Board Panel and TDCJ - Parole Division
Case Number: 4:2021cv00832
Filed: July 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE: On the motion of Respondent, the Director's time for filing a response is extended up to and including Monday, October 11, 2021. Mot., ECF No. #9 . (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 8/27/2021) (pef)
August 27, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Fri Aug 27 14:48:57 CDT 2021 (crt)
August 26, 2021 Filing 9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer with Brief in Support filed by Director, TDCJ-CID with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Abell, Katherine)
July 22, 2021 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Director, TDCJ-CID. (Abell, Katherine)
July 22, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Katherine Davis Abell on behalf of Director, TDCJ-CID. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Abell, Katherine)
July 12, 2021 Filing 6 Acknowledgment of Electronic Service by Director, TDCJ-CID re #5 ORDER, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Memorandum in Support. Petition, supporting documents, if any, and Order(s) received by Office of Attorney General of Texas. Laura L Haney on 7/12/2021. (tln)
July 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER PERMITTING PROCEEDING IN THE DISTRICT COURT and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, NOTICE, AND INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES: Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, Respondent is directed to file an answer to this petition within 60 days of the date of this order, answering in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Pursuant to Rule 5(e) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of Respondents answer, motion, or other pleading. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 7/12/2021) (tln)
July 12, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Mon Jul 12 11:04:50 CDT 2021 (crt)
July 9, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3, 4. Fri Jul 9 09:17:45 CDT 2021 (crt)
July 8, 2021 Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (pef)
July 8, 2021 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: staff attorney PW. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (pef)
July 8, 2021 Filing 2 Memorandum of Law with Brief in Support filed by William M. Mann re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (pef)
July 8, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by William M. Mann. (Filing fee $5.00; receipt number FW036548) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (pef)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mann v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William M. Mann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Represented By: Katherine Davis Abell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles Div.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: B. P. P. Huntsville Parole Board Panel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TDCJ - Parole Division
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?