Rodden v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Kendal Ruth Rodden |
Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
Social Security Administration - Interested Party |
4:2021cv00884 |
July 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Jeffrey L Cureton |
Mark Pittman |
Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 USMS Process Receipt and Return/SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration; served on 08/16/2021. (pef) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to U.S. Attorney General; served on 8/9/2021. (bdb) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration (U.S. Attorney); served on 8/2/2021. (pef) |
Filing 7 Summons issued as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (Summons, USM-285, and #1 Complaint provided to USMS) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) USM-285) (bdb) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Kendal Ruth Rodden. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (Honig, Ronald) |
Filing 5 ORDER PERMITTING FILING IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND ORDER REGARDING COMPLETION OF SUMMONS AND ISSUANCE OF PROCESS: The motion/application to proceed in forma pauperis [doc. #3 ] be, and is hereby, GRANTED. The clerk of Court mail to Plaintiff six summons forms and three Forms 285. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 7/26/2021) (Attachments: #1 Six Summons Forms, #2 Three USM-285 Forms) (pef) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. File to: No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (pef) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kendal Ruth Rodden (Attachments: #1 Affidavit(s)) (Honig, Ronald) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kendal Ruth Rodden. (Honig, Ronald) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner, Social Security Administration filed by Kendal Ruth Rodden. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Honig, Ronald) Modified docket text on 7/22/2021 (pef). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.